Different documents. Different questions.

Later possibilities only. Confidential-document work needs settled privacy, retention, access and deletion rules first.

Jurisdiction stays visible

MLF is being built around a focused collection of Kenyan case law and legislation from official sources.

Export later, with the evidence

A future research export should keep citations, source links, version dates and coverage qualifications.

Choose the material

This preview changes the layout only. It does not generate a legal summary.

From a document to a research question.

A summary explains one source. The assistant explores a question across supporting authorities, with each answer claim linked to evidence.

A summary is not a treatment check.

A judgment summary describes what that court decided.

Always check the source.

• Do not omit exceptions, qualifications, minority views or the scope of the order.
• Keep unclear passages visible. Mark unsupported points, rather than inventing them.
• Do not manufacture a confidence percentage. Show what was checked, what failed and what still needs review.
• For legislation, summarize the selected version and section, including effective dates and conditions. Do not infer amendment status from the summary.

Check the argument against the other side.

Keep source text and the researcher's inference separate.

A research partner, not your legal adviser.

The proposed assistant helps find, explain and compare authorities.

Inputs are temporary on this page and are cleared when you leave the Assistant screen.

Sample drafts

Not legal advice. Have a lawyer review anything you sign.

Before you use a form

Check amendments and procedure first.

Official files come from BRS, Judiciary and Kenya Law.

Known gaps: BRS CR24 and CR27 have no download links. Four document links failed; two non-document script targets were excluded. The inventory records each gap.